해피레포트 - Question: Examine the arguments for and against the claim that globalisation is good for the poor.

카테고리 : 레포트 > 사회과학계열 파일이름 :Question Examine the.doc 문서분량 : 12 page 등록인 : coldsummer 문서뷰어 : MS-워드뷰어프로그램 등록/수정일 : 15.08.05 / 15.08.05 구매평가 : 다운로드수 : 0 판매가격 : 3,000 원

미리보기

같은분야 연관자료

보고서설명
런던대학교 대학원 국제관계 석사 과정시 작성하여 제출한 중간 보고서입니다. 세계화가 가난한 국가에 좋은 것인가에 대해 연구조사한 에세이입니다. 우선 세계화에 대한 정의를 내리려고 시도했으며 빈국의 입장에서 세계화 찬반에 대해 논의를 했습니다.

본문일부/목차
The dominant view of globalisation is that it is good for everyone. Globalists such as Financial Times` Wolf, World Bank economists Dollar and Kraay claim that globalisation has reduced poverty and inequality and has promoted economic growth across the globe. Meanwhile, among many critics of globalisation, Wade argues that the dominant view ignores negative effects of globalisation and it relies on arbitrary data from the World Bank and the IMF. Along with the debate about the benefits of globalisation for the poor, there are also many ongoing discussions as to whether globalisation is a process or a theory, and it is a new or an old concept. Therefore, the definition of globalisation needs to be clarified for this essay before starting to examine the pros and cons of globalisation for the poor. The most well known definition of globalisation may be `the intensification of worldwide social relations which link distant localities in such a way that local happenings are shaped by events occurring many miles away and vice versa` (Giddens, 1991: 64 – cited in Kiely, 2007: 77). In this essay, therefore, globalisation specifically refers to ‘a progressive force’ which is associated with neo-liberalism that emerged since the early 1980s (Kiely, 2007: 137). 참고 자료 Bibliography Bourguignon, F. and Morrisson (2002) Inequality among world citizens, 1820-1992. American Economic Review 4. Sep. : 727-44 Chen, Shaoua, and Martin Ravallion, “How Did the World’s Poorest Fare in the 1990s?” Review of Income and Wealth, XLVII (2001), 283–300. Davies, J.B. Et al. (2006) The world distribution of household wealth. WIDER Research Paper, 5. Dec., UNU-WIDER, New York Dicken, P. (2007) Global Shift Sage, chs 2, 15-17 Dollar, D. (2005) Globalization, poverty and inequality, In M. M. Weinstein (ed.), Globalization: What`s new? New York: Columbia University Press Dollar, D. and Kraay, A (2002) Spreading the wealth. Foreign Affairs 81(1): 120-33 Giddens, A. (1991) The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Gilpin,R. (2000) The challenge of global capitalism: The world economy in the 21st century, Princeton University Press, introduction & ch.1 Held, David, (2004) Global covenant: The social democratic alternative to the Washington Consensus , MA: Polity press Held, D. and McGrew A. (2007) Globalization/Anti-Globalization, Polity Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. (1999) Globalization in Question, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Polity Jomo K.S. And S. Nagaraj eds. (2001) Globalization versus Development Palgrave Kiely, R. (2005) Empire in the Age of Globalisation, Pluto, ch.5 Kiely, R. (2007) The new political economy of development, Palgrave, ch.7 Milanvoic B. (2003) ` The Two Faces of Globalization: Against Globalization as we Know it`, World Development 31(4) Pollin, R. (2003) Contours of Descent Verso, ch.5 Sala-I-Martin, Xavier (2006) `The World Distribution of Income: Falling poeverty and... Convergence, period.` Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 121 Issue 2, p351-397 UNCTAD, 2001b Improving market access for least developed countries. UNCTAD/DITC/TNCD/4. Geneva, Switzerland, May 2001. UNCTAD, 2002b World Investment Report 2002, Geneva: UNCTAD UNDP 1997 Human Development Report 1997, New York: Oxford University Press and UN Development Programme UNDP 1999 Globalization with a Human Face: UN Human Development Report 1999. New York: Oxford University Press and UN Development Programme UNDP 2001 Human Development Report: Making Technology Work for Human Development, New York: Oxford University Press and UN Development Programme UNDP 2006 Human Development Report 2006, New York: UN Development Programme Wade R. (2008) `Globalization, Growth, Poverty, Inequality, Resentment, and Imperialism` in J. Ravenhill (ed.) Global political Economy, Oxford University Press Wade, R. and Wolf, M. (2002) Are global poverty and inequality getting worse? Prospect 72: 16-21 Wade, R. and Wolf, M. (2003) `Are global poverty and inequality getting worse?`, in Held. D and McGrew A. eds. The Global Transformations Reader, Polity Winters (2002) `Trade Liberalisation and Poverty: What are the Links?`, The World Economy 25(9): 1339-67 Wolf, M. (2002) Countries still rule the world. Financial Times, 6 Feb. World Bank 1999c World Development Report 1999/2000: Entering the 21st Century, Washington, DC: World Bank World Bank 2001a Poverty in the Age of Globalization, Washington, DC: World Bank Word Bank (2002b) `Global Economic prospects and Developing Countries – making Trade Work for the Poor`, Washington, DC: World Bank

연관검색어
영문 대학원 에세이 국제 관계 국제 정치와 경제 세계화 빈부격차 World Bank IMF

구매평가

구매평가 기록이 없습니다

보상규정 및 환불정책
· 해피레포트는 다운로드 받은 파일에 문제가 있을 경우(손상된 파일/설명과 다른자료/중복자료 등) 1주일이내 환불요청 시
환불(재충전) 해드립니다. (단, 단순 변심 및 실수로 인한 환불은 되지 않습니다.)
· 파일이 열리지 않거나 브라우저 오류로 인해 다운이 되지 않으면 고객센터로 문의바랍니다.
· 다운로드 받은 파일은 참고자료로 이용하셔야 하며,자료의 활용에 대한 모든 책임은 다운로드 받은 회원님에게 있습니다.

저작권안내

카테고리 : 레포트 > 사회과학계열
파일이름 :Question Examine the.doc
문서분량 : 12 page	등록인 : coldsummer
문서뷰어 : MS-워드뷰어프로그램	등록/수정일 : 15.08.05 / 15.08.05
구매평가 :	다운로드수 : 0

Question: Examine the arguments for and against the claim that globalisation is good for the poor.

판매가격 : 3,000 원