해피레포트 - Question: Is deterrence still a useful strategic concept

카테고리 : 레포트 > 사회과학계열 파일이름 :Question Is deterren.doc 문서분량 : 10 page 등록인 : coldsummer 문서뷰어 : MS-워드뷰어프로그램 등록/수정일 : 15.08.05 / 15.08.05 구매평가 : 다운로드수 : 0 판매가격 : 3,000 원

미리보기

같은분야 연관자료

보고서설명
영국 런던대학교에서 국제 관계학 석사 과정을 들을면서 작성했던 중간고사 영문 에세이입니다. 국제 안보라는 수업을 수강하며 작성한 것으로 냉전 이후 시대에도 억지력이 아직 유효한 전쟁 억지 전략인가를 질문으로 연구한 글입니다.

본문일부/목차
1. Introduction 2. Is nuclear deterrence still useful? i. The vertical vs. the horizontal proliferation ii. Rationality vs. irrationality iii. Bipolar vs. unipolar world 3. Conclusion 1. Introduction Since the beginning of human history, the world has continuously witnessed small and large-scale warfare among groups or states. There are a variety of reasons why state leaders wage a war, including religious, territorial, political, economic and cultural issues. State leaders and military strategists, however, do not engage in a war recklessly because they know how devastating a war can be. In particular, through the two most horrible world wars, the world suffered enormous damage and recognized that a war should be avoided. After 1945, state leaders endeavoured to ban wars between states and in fact, the world has experienced few major wars since the end of the Second World War. This era was called the Cold War and it continued until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. During the Cold War, the strategy of deterrence worked effectively to prevent the Soviet Union from invading North Atlantic Treaty Organisation(NATO) countries. More specifically, nuclear weapons between two superpowers, the United Sates and the Soviet Union worked as a deterrent against mutually destructive wars (Walton & Gray, 2007: 209). It is hard to say whether such deterrence is still a useful strategic concept in the post-Cold War world because the international circumstances have changed in many ways since the end of the Cold War. It can be argued, however, that nuclear weapons have become less effective as a deterrent in the post-Cold War world than they were in the Cold War era. Nevertheless, we should keep in mind that nuclear weapons are still important in the contemporary world as seen in that ‘nuclear weapons remain the most awesome disciplinary instrument around’ (Freedman, 2005:121). 참고 자료 Bibliography Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms (1994), Joint Pub. 1-02, Washington, D.C.:GPO Ferris, (2007) `Conventional Power and Contemporary Warfare`, in Baylis, et al.(eds), Strategy in the Contemporary World, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, chap. 12 Freedman, Lawrence (2005), Deterrence, Cambridge: Polity, chaps. 2-3, 8 Freedman, Lawrence (2003), The Revolution of Nuclear Strategy, London: Palgrave Freedman, Lawrence (1994), War, Oxford: Oxford University Press, Section E Gray, Colin S. (1999), Modern Strategy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, chaps, 11-12 Jervis, Robert (1989), The meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon, Ithaca: Cornel University Press, chaps. 1&2 Jervis, Robert (1988), `The Political Effects of Nuclear Weapons`, International Security, 13 (Fall): 80-90 Keegan, John (1998), War and Our World, London Lebow, Richard Ned and Janice Gross Stein (1989), `Rational Deterrence Theory: I Think, Therefore I Deter`, World Politics Vol. 41, No. 2: 208-224 Levine, David K. & Levine, Robert A.(2006), ‘DETERRENCE IN THE COLD WAR AND THE ‘WAR ON TERROR’, Defence and Peace Economics, Vol. 17(6), December, pp. 605–617 Lieber, Keir A. and Daryl G. Press (2006), `The rise of U.S. Nuclear Primacy`, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 85, No. 2:42-54 Payne, Keith B.(1996), Deterrence in the Second Nuclear Age, The University Press of Kentucky Thayer, BRADLEY A. (2007), ‘Thinking about Nuclear Deterrence Theory: Why Evolutionary Psychology Undermines Its Rational Actor Assumptions’, Comparative Strategy, 26:311–323 Walton and Gray, (2007) `The Second Nuclear Age: Nuclear Weapons in the Twenty-First Century`, in Baylis, et al.(eds), Strategy in the Contemporary World, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, chap. 10 Wohlstetter, Albert (1959), `The Delicate Balance of Terror`, Foreign Affairs Vol. 37 (January): 209-234

연관검색어
국제안보 보안 전쟁 억지력 냉전 이후 시대 Is deterrence still

구매평가

구매평가 기록이 없습니다

보상규정 및 환불정책
· 해피레포트는 다운로드 받은 파일에 문제가 있을 경우(손상된 파일/설명과 다른자료/중복자료 등) 1주일이내 환불요청 시
환불(재충전) 해드립니다. (단, 단순 변심 및 실수로 인한 환불은 되지 않습니다.)
· 파일이 열리지 않거나 브라우저 오류로 인해 다운이 되지 않으면 고객센터로 문의바랍니다.
· 다운로드 받은 파일은 참고자료로 이용하셔야 하며,자료의 활용에 대한 모든 책임은 다운로드 받은 회원님에게 있습니다.

저작권안내

카테고리 : 레포트 > 사회과학계열
파일이름 :Question Is deterren.doc
문서분량 : 10 page	등록인 : coldsummer
문서뷰어 : MS-워드뷰어프로그램	등록/수정일 : 15.08.05 / 15.08.05
구매평가 :	다운로드수 : 0

Question: Is deterrence still a useful strategic concept

판매가격 : 3,000 원