국제관계에서 얼마나 성적 편중이 심화되고 있는지에 대한 조사 연구 보고서입니다. 런던 대학원에서 국제관계이론이라는 수업의 중간고사 에세이입니다.
먼저 국제 관계라는 학문을 정의하고 gender라는 개념을 정립한 후 질문의 요지에 답하려고 노력했습니다. 높은 점수를 받은 보고서이고 다양한 참고문헌을 활용했습니다.
본문일부/목차
Half of the world’s population is female and women are actively participating in political, economic and social development across the globe. However, women are still subjected to men in many ways and still face entrenched inequality. We experience the distinct dichotomy between masculinity and femininity in everyday life and patriarchy is too dominant in most societies. The patriarchal system places masculinity above femininity, and men are privileged as a result. Such gender inequalities between men and women are conspicuous particularly in the discipline of International Relations (IR). One of the examples that show the discipline of IR is gendered is the above essay question itself. The question, ‘to what extent is the discipline of International Relations gendered’, indicates clearly that IR is androcentric since if IR is gender-neutral, this question will not be asked. Another example is the question which is raised by Steans, `where are the women in international relations?(2006:1) This question confirms that women are under-represented in the academic discourse of IR.
참고 자료
Acker, Joan(2004) ‘Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations’ in Kimmel, S., Michael & Amy Aronson(eds) The Gendered Society Reader(New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 264-276
Binnie, John,’The nation and Sexual Dissidence’ in The Globalization of Sexuality( London: Sage, 2004)
Brown, Chris & Kirsten Ainley, Understanding International Relations(China: Palgrave Macmillan,2005)
Elshtain, Jean Bethke, Public Man, Private Woman: Women in Social and Political Thought(Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1981)
Enloe, C. Bananas, Beaches and Bases :Making Feminist Sense of International Politics(London: Pandora Books, 1989)
Hutchings, K.(2000) ‘Towards a Feminist International Ethics’ Review of International Studies, Vol.26, no. 5, pp.111-130
Moon, Katherine L., Sex among Allies: Military Prostitution in US-Korea Relations(New York: Columbia University,1997), pp. 17-47
Peterson, V. Spike(1992)’Transgressing Boundaries: Theories of Knowledge, Gender and International Relations’ Millennium-Journal of International Studies, Vol 21, no.2, pp. 183-206
Steans, Jill, Gender and International Relations(Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006)
Stokes, Wendy, Women in Contemporary Politics(Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005)
Tickner J. Ann(2008) ‘Gender in World Politics’ in Baylis, J., S Smith & P. Owens(eds) Globalization of World Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 263-277
Tickner J. Ann(1988) ‘Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation’ Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 17; 429
Tickner J. Ann, Gender in International Relations: Feminist perspectives on Achieving Global Security(New York: Columbia University Press,1992)
True, J.(2005) ‘Feminism’ in S. Burchill and A. Linklater(eds) Theories of International Relations(New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp.213-234
Whitworth, Sandra(2001) ‘The practice, and praxis, of feminist research in international relations’ in Wyn Jones, Richard(ed) Critical theory & world politics(London: Lynne Rienner Publishers), pp. 149-160
Young, Gillian,(2006) ‘Feminist international relations in the age of the war on terror” Ideologies, religions and conflict’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol8, no.1, pp3-18
Zalewski, Marysia(1994) ‘The Women/’Women’ Question in International Relations’ Millennium-Journal of International Studies, Vol. 23, No.2, pp. 407-23
· 해피레포트는 다운로드 받은 파일에 문제가 있을 경우(손상된 파일/설명과 다른자료/중복자료 등) 1주일이내 환불요청 시 환불(재충전) 해드립니다.
(단, 단순 변심 및 실수로 인한 환불은 되지 않습니다.)
· 파일이 열리지 않거나 브라우저 오류로 인해 다운이 되지 않으면 고객센터로 문의바랍니다.
· 다운로드 받은 파일은 참고자료로 이용하셔야 하며,자료의 활용에 대한 모든 책임은 다운로드 받은 회원님에게 있습니다.
저작권안내
보고서 내용중의 의견 및 입장은 당사와 무관하며, 그 내용의 진위여부도 당사는 보증하지 않습니다.
보고서의 저작권 및 모든 법적 책임은 등록인에게 있으며, 무단전재 및 재배포를 금합니다.
저작권 문제 발생시 원저작권자의 입장에서 해결해드리고 있습니다. 저작권침해신고 바로가기